Is it better ? No, in my humble opinion -but I really liked season 1 and have not yet seen season 2.
I just finished watching the season 2 finale of “Being Human” on BBC America. It was miles better than the season 3 finale of “True Blood.”
“Being Human” hasn’t gotten off track (yet) with heaps of new characters and subplots. It still focuses mostly on the three supes: Vampire Mitchell (the smoldering Aidan Turner, who could rival any hottie on “True Blood”), ghost Annie (the beautiful and perfect Lenora Crichlow, whom I loved in “Collision” on PBS) and werewolf George (adorably nerdy Russell Tovey and his ears, which deserve separate billing).
read on
Monday, September 20, 2010
Is ‘Being Human’ better than ‘True Blood’?
True Blood in Dallas: Is ‘Being Human’ better than ‘True Blood’?Tweet this! Posted by " Dallas " at 9:21 AM
Labels: vampires television
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Season 2 blew Season 1 out of the water, it was spectacular. In some ways, I hate to say it, I do think it's better than True Blood.
Season 2 blew Season 1 out of the water, it was spectacular. In some ways, I hate to say it, I do think it's better than True Blood.
Post a Comment